CCM's Dried Salmon Message Board
« Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's US »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 31, 2009, 4:31pm

[Home] [Help] [Search] [Calendar] [Login] [Register] [Live Chat]


Welcome to Clatsop County Matters' Dried Salmon Open Forum. This forum is about community building. Speak up and out for your family, friends, neighbors and co-workers.

If the topic you want to discuss isn't here, feel free to add it. Our new feature is a live chat. Click on the chat button to talk to another reader, right now!

To answer a specific post: Position cursor over the word "quote" located on the post you want to reply to and click. Write your reply under the pre-written paragraph.

Please read posting notices and agreements in Clatsop County Matters to whom board before making a post to any board/thread/topic


This was brought over from the old CCM forum where Josh Marquis, District Attorney for Clatsop County, invited people to ask him questions and directed them to his blog. While he may continue to answer questions here, he has asked that people go to his site to post their queries.

CCM's Dried Salmon Message Board :: General :: District Attorney Matters :: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's US
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread][Reply] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
AuthorTopic: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's US (Read 576 times)
Wondering
Guest
Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's US
« Thread Started on Nov 1, 2009, 11:04pm »		[Quote]
Why would Obama appoint a schemer like Josh Marquis to be Oregon's next US Attorney and how did Marquis elbow out John Foote?

Marquis is used to a very easy job, one he doesn't work very hard at. He has ada's carrying his load. He has one deputy district attorney for every 5,400 constituents in Clatsop County. The only way Marquis would be able to handle the US Attorney job is if he had a staff of 701 assistant deputy attorneys working for him! One for every 5,400 pop. in Oregon.

Obama has a performance based approach to budgeting that Marquis has shown ALL of Oregon he is firmly against.


Obama says that his administration will be known as being above board and will not have any special treatment. Yet, Marquis is well known for using his office for special treatment. Over and over he uses the office of District Attorney to get back at those he considers having done him wrong. He says in this email that the commissioners will have to live with the consequences of taking his stipend away from him when he refused to do the performance based budgeting (after being given four years of warnings).

Obama promised the public that his administration would be "open and transparent" ordering all offices to comply with FOIA requests. Look how Marquis complies to freedom of information requests and public information requests sent to him. He lies to Pete Shepherd, deputy assistant general, and tells him he NEVER wrote any emails mentioning his stipend! Yet, not even three months earlier he wrote repeatedly about his stipend.

Josh Marquis has the audacity to blatantly lie to a deputy assistant general for the state of Oregon, telling him:"A citizens committee with which I am not affiliated has proposed gathering signatures for the county home rule charter. I will check but I am fairly certain that there have been no emails or correspondence or memos of any kind generated by me as District Attorney on the subject." When barely ONE MONTH earlier he is emailing Commissioner Patrick, saying "The District Attorney approves the language [of the change to the charter]" and "When I get back we can discuss who to have on the committee to gather signatures" "We should have the petition ready to go by the end of June, that way we can blame it on the budget ..."

How this District Attorney was appointed over so many others in Oregon shows the level of integrity Wyden has, or, rather, lacks. Back-scratching is still the rule of law in Oregon, rather than justice. Pity us here, with our eco-terrorists running the show, our Nanny Kroger monitoring our every move, and our District Attorneys using their offices to reek revenge on all who oppose them.

Whoopee! Obama has come! All will change!

Okay, nothing has changed, except for the faces.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
lani
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #1 on Nov 1, 2009, 11:12pm »		[Quote]
I think it is important to note here that he was using the District Attorney's county email account when he sent out those emails! So it definitely was as District Attorney that he was sending out the correspondence. His other account, that he calls his "private one" on AOL is under "coast_da@aol.com" How can it be considered "private" when he is using a title conferred on him by a public election? He is using something that the taxpayers have paid for and the taxpayers have a right to look at it.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Patsy No More
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #2 on Nov 7, 2009, 1:37am »		[Quote]
Because Marquis made sure only two dweebs were considered next to him. It means Wyden hates the hell out of Oregon.

Wyden chooses to nominate a man who refused to do a simple performance based budget. One that district attorneys in counties 10 times larger than clatsop county, with prosecutors offices providing 10 times the services easily handled and who Marquis could simply refer to for guidance and he refused because, "The Board isn't the boss of me"!

A man who was tearing the Oregon District Attorney's association apart with his ego quest to tie his salary to that of a judge's. Judges who salary package's now total over $150,000 and Clatsop County tax payers would be liable to make up the difference.

A man who LIED to the Attorney General's office July 11th, 2007, telling the Deputy Attorney General, Pete Shepherd, that he didn't generate any emails as the district attorney that referred to gathering signatures to change the home rule charter. A BLATANT LIE.

On June 4th, 2007, using his District Attorney email account on the clatsop county server he sent two emails to Sam Patrick.

Patrick writes: Hi Josh, would you prepare the necessary verbage to change the county charter to tie your salary to that of a judge? As soon as we have the petition we can start the process. Thanks! Sam & Myrna

Marquis replies: I would be happy to although I really think we should wait until June 30 to start circulating. The best argument is that nothing else worked and they'll weasel that the budget process {he doesn't finish the sentence} Also we want to really lock down a bunch of community co-chairs like Jerry Ostermiller and Don Haskell who are both traveling until late June. - Josh


Patrick: I think we should wait until after the meeting too. But I think we should be ready to droop the petition on elections right after the vote. If we're lucky we can get it done by the 20th. I don't know how long it will take to get the language approved, so we can't get the signatures until that has been accomplished. If you think this is workable put it together and I will get it to someone to start the ball rolling if needed. Thanks - Sam

AND JOSH'S REPLY
Well the DA approves the language so I'll probably ask another another DA's office to handle that function because of a possible conflict. ... When I get back let's discuss the core committee members ...

WOW! And a month later he is LYING to the Attorney General's office telling them 1) A committee he has no affiliation with has come up with an idea to change the county charter, tie his salary to that of a judge, and has started a petition drive 2) He has never generated any email, correspondence or memos as the district attorney on this subject!

And this is the man Wyden recommends as Oregon's US Attorney! Won't attorneys of anyone charged in Oregon Fed Courts have a heyday showing the jury that the man accusing their clients is nothing but a liar himself!

http://wyden.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=319390

http://clatsopcocontroversy.com/SupportDocs.html

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
mcgee
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #3 on Nov 7, 2009, 3:46pm »		[Quote]
And with 2054 other posts to back it up, the vailidity of this new cause, however well intentioned, is clearly negated by the simple chronology of a bunch of mostly anonymous "Nutbags" out to get "The Clatop County DA" at whatever cost and for whatever undocumented and unfounded reasons but, we know who's at the bottom of all this don't we and likely so do the appointing authorities who probably have this person on a "Watch List".
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
voter speaks
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #4 on Nov 7, 2009, 8:03pm »		[Quote]
A voter is not a nutbag or "out to get the DA" because you were out to get the DA a one time doesn't mean everyone else is .
We are wanting to discover the truth. The Comissioners were trying to get to the truth as well. The reason they demanded the performance
based approach was asking a department head to do his job.
I was told your hate for the man was on a baby scale compared too what the citzens now have heard.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Letmgo
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #5 on Nov 7, 2009, 8:19pm »		[Quote]
McGee, they may be nut bags, but you are a nut sack and a big one.

With that said, I would like this anti-Josh person to quiet down about the DA because I don't want them to queer the only chance we may have of getting rid of him.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
angry
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #6 on Nov 7, 2009, 8:48pm »		[Quote]
Talk all you want, send letters of request for a new DA.
Marquis will not get voted in for the year 2010.
LETMGO....There is more then 0ne anti-Josh person. I suspect you are Mcgee , he thinks as you do one anti-josh person.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
duh
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #7 on Nov 7, 2009, 11:16pm »		[Quote]

Nov 7, 2009, 3:46pm, mcgee wrote:
And with 2054 other posts to back it up, the vailidity of this new cause, however well intentioned, is clearly negated by the simple chronology of a bunch of mostly anonymous "Nutbags" out to get "The Clatop County DA" at whatever cost and for whatever undocumented and unfounded reasons but, we know who's at the bottom of all this don't we and likely so do the appointing authorities who probably have this person on a "Watch List".


LOL!
Ummm to dangit! funny. The documentation in front of your nose and you call it "undocumented".

YOU want someone who blatantly, and with complete impunity, lies to the Attorney General's office, to represent the United States of America as Oregon's US Attorney?

You are the nutjob everyone says you are.

People that Marquis hates are on a "watch list"? DOOOOO tell! Amaze, amaze, amaze. Josh Marquis uses his office to exact revenge on those he considers his enemies? :o :o :o Well, that's the most amazing thing I've heard since learning Marquis likes the media!

Sorry, letmgo, as has been said in the past, if that a-hole makes it to US Attorney he aint done screwing with anyone he considers an enemy. all it means is he has more tools to crikey with. 6,666 people voted against him getting his stipend back. Marquis aint forgetting that. his grudge is against this whole county. and as he said, "pay back is a bitch and cindy's mine."
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Mr McGee Fan
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #8 on Nov 8, 2009, 9:22am »		[Quote]

Nov 7, 2009, 11:16pm, duh wrote:
You are the nutjob everyone says you are.

People that Marquis hates are on a "watch list"?


LOL, yeah, McGee is well documented nut.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
cdgoldfinch
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 0
Karma: 0
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #9 on Nov 8, 2009, 9:31am »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 9:22am, Mr McGee Fan wrote:

Nov 7, 2009, 11:16pm, duh wrote:
You are the nutjob everyone says you are.

People that Marquis hates are on a "watch list"?


LOL, yeah, McGee is well documented nut.


And with purpose, at that.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
uppertown bub
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #10 on Nov 8, 2009, 1:54pm »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 9:31am, cdgoldfinch wrote:

Nov 8, 2009, 9:22am, Mr McGee Fan wrote:


LOL, yeah, McGee is well documented nut.


And with purpose, at that.

purpose? bwahahahaha!
what purpose does a cut-and-paste plagiarizing "blogger" serve?
what purpose does a "house designer" who reprints clip-art designs as his own serve?
what purpose does a "candidate" for public office serve when he won't make any public statements or face the public to answer their questions?
what purpose does that "candidate" serve when he demands that others in public office be accountable to the voters?
what purpose does a smug sarcastic egomaniac serve in a community where he dishes out calls for action that he doesn't participate in?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
mcgee
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #11 on Nov 8, 2009, 3:02pm »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 1:54pm, uppertown bub wrote:

Nov 8, 2009, 9:31am, cdgoldfinch wrote:


And with purpose, at that.

purpose? bwahahahaha!
what purpose does a cut-and-paste plagiarizing "blogger" serve?
what purpose does a "house designer" who reprints clip-art designs as his own serve?
what purpose does a "candidate" for public office serve when he won't make any public statements or face the public to answer their questions?
what purpose does that "candidate" serve when he demands that others in public office be accountable to the voters?
what purpose does a smug sarcastic egomaniac serve in a community where he dishes out calls for action that he doesn't participate in?


To give your little site here some purpose "Nobody".
To keep you from having to make up all those pseudonyms "Nobody"
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Mr McGee Fan
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #12 on Nov 8, 2009, 5:00pm »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 9:31am, cdgoldfinch wrote:

Nov 8, 2009, 9:22am, Mr McGee Fan wrote:


LOL, yeah, McGee is well documented nut.


And with purpose, at that.


McGee, you ain'tGoldfinch, and you don't have any discernable purpose.

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
uppertown bub
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #13 on Nov 8, 2009, 5:48pm »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 3:02pm, mcgee wrote:

Nov 8, 2009, 1:54pm, uppertown bub wrote:

purpose? bwahahahaha!
what purpose does a cut-and-paste plagiarizing "blogger" serve?
what purpose does a "house designer" who reprints clip-art designs as his own serve?
what purpose does a "candidate" for public office serve when he won't make any public statements or face the public to answer their questions?
what purpose does that "candidate" serve when he demands that others in public office be accountable to the voters?
what purpose does a smug sarcastic egomaniac serve in a community where he dishes out calls for action that he doesn't participate in?


To give your little site here some purpose "Nobody".
To keep you from having to make up all those pseudonyms "Nobody"


seems to me a man whose life is all imitations and blowing smoke is the "nobody".
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
mcgee
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #14 on Nov 8, 2009, 7:41pm »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 5:48pm, uppertown bub wrote:

Nov 8, 2009, 3:02pm, mcgee wrote:


To give your little site here some purpose "Nobody".
To keep you from having to make up all those pseudonyms "Nobody"


seems to me a man whose life is all imitations and blowing smoke is the "nobody".


Seems to you?

So, who are you and what does it matter what seems to you "Nobody"?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
somebody
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #15 on Nov 8, 2009, 8:14pm »		[Quote]
McGee, you should be familiar with nobody because that's who is reading your blog.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
concerned citizen
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #16 on Nov 8, 2009, 8:17pm »		[Quote]

Nov 7, 2009, 3:46pm, mcgee wrote:
we know who's at the bottom of all this don't we and likely so do the appointing authorities who probably have this person on a "Watch List".



BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAH!!! Really, McGee, no one can ever knock you out of the shitbird seat as long as you keep posting lame crap like above. "watch list"??? HAHAHAHAHA!! What next, you gonna go all Barney Fife on somebody and start hollerin' "CITIZEN'S ARREST--CITIZEN'S ARREST!!!"

Your continuous and gratuitous humping the legs of weasles like Forrester and Marquis in hopes you'll get "noticed by your heros" is one of truely amusing things in the history of the Clatsop County online experience. You are undoubtedly the premiere all time assclown of the local net scene.

No wonder you don't have any support or friends on all these boards and blogs....even the people whose legs you hump avoid you like the plague--what a sick, twisted, yet strangely pathetic little man you are.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
mcgee
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #17 on Nov 8, 2009, 8:59pm »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 8:17pm, concerned citizen wrote:

Nov 7, 2009, 3:46pm, mcgee wrote:
we know who's at the bottom of all this don't we and likely so do the appointing authorities who probably have this person on a "Watch List".



BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAH!!! Really, McGee, no one can ever knock you out of the shitbird seat as long as you keep posting lame crap like above. "watch list"??? HAHAHAHAHA!! What next, you gonna go all Barney Fife on somebody and start hollerin' "CITIZEN'S ARREST--CITIZEN'S ARREST!!!"


Your continuous and gratuitous humping the legs of weasles like Forrester and Marquis in hopes you'll get "noticed by your heros" is one of truely amusing things in the history of the Clatsop County online experience. You are undoubtedly the premiere all time assclown of the local net scene.

No wonder you don't have any support or friends on all these boards and blogs....even the people whose legs you hump avoid you like the plague--what a sick, twisted, yet strangely pathetic little man you are.


What was the topic of this discussion?

Pat McGee was it?

Why, no, it wasn't was it?

Jeesh!!

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Jerome Kensington
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #18 on Nov 8, 2009, 9:39pm »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 8:59pm, mcgee wrote:

Nov 8, 2009, 8:17pm, concerned citizen wrote:



BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAH!!! Really, McGee, no one can ever knock you out of the shitbird seat as long as you keep posting lame crap like above. "watch list"??? HAHAHAHAHA!! What next, you gonna go all Barney Fife on somebody and start hollerin' "CITIZEN'S ARREST--CITIZEN'S ARREST!!!"


Your continuous and gratuitous humping the legs of weasles like Forrester and Marquis in hopes you'll get "noticed by your heros" is one of truely amusing things in the history of the Clatsop County online experience. You are undoubtedly the premiere all time assclown of the local net scene.

No wonder you don't have any support or friends on all these boards and blogs....even the people whose legs you hump avoid you like the plague--what a sick, twisted, yet strangely pathetic little man you are.


What was the topic of this discussion?

Pat McGee was it?

Why, no, it wasn't was it?

Jeesh!!



Gee McGee, looks like all that bad juju you've been spreading in this community has come back all over you. You've become a distraction in every issue you get involved in, and you are responsible for that. Should have been a nicer guy.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Louis Moonsnail
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #19 on Nov 8, 2009, 9:46pm »		[Quote]
Careful, Jerome...McGee will rat you out to his vaunted "appointing authorities" and you'll get put on the dreaded watch list.



Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
The All Seeing Eye
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #20 on Nov 8, 2009, 9:57pm »		[Quote]

Nov 7, 2009, 3:46pm, mcgee wrote:
the appointing authorities who probably have this person on a "Watch List".


Thanks, Goody McGee..I'm on it. I'm watching. Thank you for being a good citizen. I'll make sure Steve and Josh know you're on the side of the good guys. I'll make sure Gamm or Elleda get your name in the paper and then maybe Josh will invite you over to mow his lawn or something. The ytake this watch list very seriously. They don't like the idea that middle aged people can comfortably sit in their homes and post anonymous humorous pot shots at big wheels like Marquis and Forrester.

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Vern Johnson
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #21 on Nov 8, 2009, 10:02pm »		[Quote]
[image]
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Floyd
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #22 on Nov 8, 2009, 10:17pm »		[Quote]

Nov 7, 2009, 3:46pm, mcgee wrote:


[image]
Yo, Steve? yeah, McGee here--- run this on the front page. There's "Nutbags" out to get "The Clatop County DA" at whatever cost and for whatever undocumented and unfounded reasons but, we know who's at the bottom of all this don't we and likely so do the appointing authorities who have this person on a "Watch List".
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
mcgee
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #23 on Nov 9, 2009, 7:24am »		[Quote]
And what was the subject of this thread, again?

Pat McGee was it?

Why, no, it wasn't.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
mcgee
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #24 on Nov 9, 2009, 7:35am »		[Quote]
3 of 24 posts on subject only.

How is it your attention can be diverted so easily?

It's as if it were deliberate.

Hmmmmmm!

And DA Marquis' appointers are going to come to this site and review it with any sense legitimacy other than an obvious message of obsessive hatred?

Just saying.......
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Shadow
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #25 on Nov 9, 2009, 8:13am »		[Quote]

Nov 9, 2009, 7:35am, mcgee wrote:
[image]
And DA Marquis' appointers are going to come to this site and review it with any sense legitimacy other than an obvious message of obsessive hatred?


What time will the appointers be here? Will they bring the watch list?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Uninvited
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #26 on Nov 9, 2009, 9:38am »		[Quote]

Nov 8, 2009, 8:59pm, mcgee wrote:
[image]
What was the topic of this discussion?

Pat McGee was it?

Why, no, it wasn't was it?

Jeesh!!



McGee anguishes over the deep implications of this thread as he grapples with his demons....hopefully the appointers will come to his rescue
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Jerome Kensington
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #27 on Nov 9, 2009, 11:18am »		[Quote]

Nov 9, 2009, 9:38am, Uninvited wrote:

Nov 8, 2009, 8:59pm, mcgee wrote:
[image]
What was the topic of this discussion?

Pat McGee was it?

Why, no, it wasn't was it?

Jeesh!!



McGee anguishes over the deep implications of this thread as he grapples with his demons....hopefully the appointers will come to his rescue

McGee just needs a good tickling.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Limpy
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #28 on Nov 9, 2009, 5:38pm »		[Quote]
True, as we all know, Obama's people are all idiots who don't look at documentation or evidence of misdeeds, instead they just look at the potshots, innuendos and gossip like the rest of the Democratic party in Clatsop County. Hell, I heard he's thinking of appointing Larry Taylor head of the DNC to recall ALL Of the recently elected REPUBLICANS across the country.

Josh Marquis and Larry have the play book. Have High School Journalism teachers team up with local town bully editors, make up stories and ruin peoples' lives. They have a formula that's worked twice. Next they'll be peddling it statewide to see how it works before selling it nationwide.

If they can eat their own see how well it can work on the other side?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
The All Seeing Eye
Guest
Re: Why Would Obama Appoint a Crook to be Oregon's
« Reply #29 on Nov 9, 2009, 8:02pm »		[Quote]

Nov 9, 2009, 7:35am, mcgee wrote:


And DA Marquis' appointers are going to come to this site and review it with any sense legitimacy other than an obvious message of obsessive hatred?


Notice how McGee always asks the tough questions? The questions no one else has the guts to ask-mainly, because they're questions that plum just don't make any sense.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Page 1 of 2 » Jump to page   Go    [Search This Thread][Reply] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

This board of Dried Salmon forum has been viewed the following number of times:

Return to front page of this forum. Visit old CCM forum's archives and blog links. Visit CCM's own newblog.
Thank-you for stopping by! As of this moment, the page load count on this forum is:

web statistics

Go to our old archives at the Voy blogs link page or here to the Front Page of this forum.

Google
Webdriedsalmon.proboards.com
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!